<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Central Indiana Cancer Centers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://indianacancer.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://indianacancer.com</link>
	<description>Just another Cancercenter.cc Blogs weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 14:11:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Oncotype DX® Predicts Recurrence Risk in Node-negative and Node-positive Breast Cancer Treated with Tamoxifen or Arimidex</title>
		<link>http://indianacancer.com/oncotype-dx%c2%ae-predicts-recurrence-risk-in-node-negative-and-node-positive-breast-cancer-treated-with-tamoxifen-or-arimidex/</link>
		<comments>http://indianacancer.com/oncotype-dx%c2%ae-predicts-recurrence-risk-in-node-negative-and-node-positive-breast-cancer-treated-with-tamoxifen-or-arimidex/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 14:11:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Breast Cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stage I Node Negative Breast Cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stages II-III Breast Cancer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://indianacancer.cancercenter.cc/oncotype-dx%c2%ae-predicts-recurrence-risk-in-node-negative-and-node-positive-breast-cancer-treated-with-tamoxifen-or-arimidex/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Among postmenopausal women with early, hormone receptor-positive  breast cancer treated with either tamoxifen (Nolvadex®) or Arimidex® (anastrozole), the Oncotype DX test predicts the risk of  distant cancer recurrence in both node-negative and node-positive  patients. These results were published in the Journal of Clinical  Oncology.
Oncotype  DX is a genomic test that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Among postmenopausal women with early, hormone receptor-positive  breast cancer treated with either tamoxifen (Nolvadex®) or Arimidex<strong>®</strong> (anastrozole), the Onco<em>type</em> DX test predicts the risk of  distant cancer recurrence in both node-negative and node-positive  patients. These results were published in the <em>Journal of Clinical  Oncology</em>.</p>
<p>Oncotype  DX is a genomic test that has been shown to predict the likelihood  of distant cancer recurrence and the likelihood of chemotherapy benefit  in women with early-stage, estrogen receptor-positive breast  cancer that is treated with tamoxifen. The test evaluates the  activity of 21 genes from a sample of the patient’s cancer to determine  the patient’s Recurrence Score. The higher the Recurrence Score, the  higher the risk of cancer recurrence. Onco<em>type</em> DX has been  added to U.S. medical guidelines for early-stage breast cancer.</p>
<p>The current analysis assessed how the Recurrence Score performed  among women treated with the aromatase inhibitor drug Arimidex and among  those with node-positive breast cancer.</p>
<p>The researchers collected information from 1,231 women who  participated in the ATAC (Arimidex, Tamoxifen, Alone or in Combination)  study. The study enrolled postmenopausal women with early, hormone  receptor-positive breast cancer. Study participants received hormonal  therapy with either tamoxifen or Arimidex.</p>
<p>The Recurrence Score (RS) predicted the risk of distant cancer  recurrence among women with node-negative and node-positive breast  cancer:</p>
<ul>
<li>Among women with      node-negative breast cancer, nine-year risk of  distant cancer recurrence      was 4% among women with a low Recurrence  Score, 12% among women with an      intermediate Recurrence Score, and  25% among women with a high Recurrence      Score.</li>
<li>Among women with      node-positive breast cancer, nine-year risk of  distant cancer recurrence      was 17% among women with a low  Recurrence Score, 28% among women with an      intermediate Recurrence  Score, and 49% among women with a high Recurrence      Score.</li>
</ul>
<p>The relationship between Recurrence Score and risk of distant cancer  recurrence was similar regardless of the type of hormonal therapy that  the women received.</p>
<p>This study suggests that the Onco<em>type</em> DX test provides  information about risk of distant cancer recurrence in both  node-negative and node-positive, hormone-receptor positive breast  cancer. Furthermore, Onco<em>type</em> DX was predictive of distant  recurrence risk among women treated with tamoxifen as well as women  treated with Arimidex.</p>
<p><strong>Reference:</strong> Dowsett M, Cuzick J, Wales C et al.  Prediction of risk of distant recurrence using the 21-gene recurrence  score in node-negative and node-positive postmenopausal patients with  breast cancer treated with anastrozole or tamoxifen: a TransATAC study. <em>Journal  of Clinical Oncology</em> [early online publication]. March 8, 2010.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://indianacancer.com/oncotype-dx%c2%ae-predicts-recurrence-risk-in-node-negative-and-node-positive-breast-cancer-treated-with-tamoxifen-or-arimidex/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Addition of Hormone Therapy to Radiation Improves Survival in Intermediate-risk, Early-stage Prostate Cancer</title>
		<link>http://indianacancer.com/addition-of-hormone-therapy-to-radiation-improves-survival-in-intermediate-risk-early-stage-prostate-cancer/</link>
		<comments>http://indianacancer.com/addition-of-hormone-therapy-to-radiation-improves-survival-in-intermediate-risk-early-stage-prostate-cancer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 14:07:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Early Stage I-II (A-B) Prostate Cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prostate Cancer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://indianacancer.cancercenter.cc/addition-of-hormone-therapy-to-radiation-improves-survival-in-intermediate-risk-early-stage-prostate-cancer/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Short-term hormone therapy delivered before and during moderate-dose  radiation therapy improves survival and reduces risk of recurrence  compared with radiation alone in men with intermediate-risk, early-stage  prostate cancer. The results of this Phase III study were presented at  the 2010 Genitourinary Cancers Symposium in San Francisco.1
Early-stage prostate  cancer refers to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Short-term hormone therapy delivered before and during moderate-dose  radiation therapy improves survival and reduces risk of recurrence  compared with radiation alone in men with intermediate-risk, early-stage  prostate cancer. The results of this Phase III study were presented at  the 2010 Genitourinary Cancers Symposium in San Francisco.<a href="#_edn1">1</a></p>
<p>Early-stage prostate  cancer refers to Stage I or II  prostate cancer that is limited to the prostate and nearby lymph  nodes and has not spread from the prostate to distant sites in the body.  Men who have intermediate-risk, early-stage prostate cancer have  disease that is likely to recur.</p>
<p>Standard therapy for early-stage prostate cancer may include surgery,  radiation therapy, watchful waiting (no treatment until disease  progression), and hormone therapy. Optimal treatment for early prostate  cancer is still under debate, though it appears that individualized  approaches may provide the best outcomes.</p>
<p>Though hormone therapy is often used to slow the growth of advanced  prostate cancer, its use in early-stage cancer is still being evaluated.  A large Phase III Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) study  involved 1,979 men with early-stage prostate cancer who had a PSA of 20  or less; 987 men received four months of hormone therapy (HRT), starting  two months prior to radiation therapy, and 992 men received the  standard treatment of radiation therapy alone.</p>
<p>After a median follow-up of 8.4 years in the HRT group and 8.1 years  in the radiation-only group, 51% of patients who received HRT were still  alive at 12 years compared with 46% of those who received radiation  alone. The survival benefit appeared to be greatest for men with  intermediate-risk disease; men with low-risk disease did not benefit  from the addition of HRT. Furthermore, two years following treatment,  843 men underwent prostate biopsies. Seventy-eight percent of biopsies  in the HRT group showed no cancer compared with 60% in the  radiation-only group. The hormone therapy was well tolerated.</p>
<p>The researchers concluded that men with intermediate-risk,  early-stage prostate cancer may benefit from the addition of HRT to  radiation. Research will be ongoing to evaluate the risks and benefits  of this treatment strategy.</p>
<p><strong>Reference: </strong></p>
<hr size="1" /><a href="#_ednref1">1</a> McGowan D, Hunt D, Jones C, et al. Effect of short-term endocrine  therapy prior to and during radiation therapy on overall survival in  patients with T1b-T2b adenocarcinoma of the prostate and PSA equal to or  less than 20: Initial results of RTOG 94-08. Presented at the 2010  Genitourinary Cancers Symposium in San Francisco March 5-7, 2010.  Abstract #6.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://indianacancer.com/addition-of-hormone-therapy-to-radiation-improves-survival-in-intermediate-risk-early-stage-prostate-cancer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cystoscopy Alone Is the Most Cost-effective Way to Monitor for Recurrence of Bladder Cancer</title>
		<link>http://indianacancer.com/cystoscopy-alone-is-the-most-cost-effective-way-to-monitor-for-recurrence-of-bladder-cancer/</link>
		<comments>http://indianacancer.com/cystoscopy-alone-is-the-most-cost-effective-way-to-monitor-for-recurrence-of-bladder-cancer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 14:03:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bladder Cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recurrent Bladder Cancer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://indianacancer.cancercenter.cc/cystoscopy-alone-is-the-most-cost-effective-way-to-monitor-for-recurrence-of-bladder-cancer/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The addition of a urine test to standard cystoscopy screening in  order to monitor for bladder cancer recurrence unnecessarily increases  the cost of monitoring as well as the risk for a false-positive result  and does not improve tumor detection, according to the results of a  study presented at the 2010 Genitourinary [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The addition of a urine test to standard cystoscopy screening in  order to monitor for bladder cancer recurrence unnecessarily increases  the cost of monitoring as well as the risk for a false-positive result  and does not improve tumor detection, according to the results of a  study presented at the 2010 Genitourinary Cancers Symposium in San  Francisco.<a href="#_edn1">1</a></p>
<p>Bladder  cancer is common; approximately 55,000 new cases are diagnosed in  the U.S. each year. Superficial bladder cancer refers to cancer that has  not spread to muscles of the bladder or nearby lymph nodes. Patients  treated for superficial, or early-stage, bladder cancer have a high risk  of recurrence and typically undergo routine screening with cystoscopy every three to  six months. (During a cystoscopy, a physician places a lighted tube into  the bladder to search for abnormal areas of tissue that indicate  cancer.)</p>
<p>Because cystoscopy can miss some cancers, some physicians have begun  to test the urine for certain cancer biomarkers in the hopes of  increasing the likelihood of detecting a cancer recurrence early.  However, it has been unclear whether these tests improve cancer  detection.</p>
<p>Researchers at the University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center  performed an analysis comparing the accuracy and costs of bladder cancer  surveillance strategies in 200 patients with a history of bladder  cancer. They compared the use of cystoscopy alone with the use of  cystoscopy and several urine tests (NMP22, FISH, cytology, and NMP22  plus FISH to confirm abnormal NMP22).</p>
<p>They found that cystoscopy alone was the least expensive test  ($7,692) and was also associated with the fewest false-positive results  (two). Cystoscopy plus the urine biomarker tests grew increasingly more  expensive. Cystoscopy plus FISH was the most expensive screening method  ($19,111) and also resulted in the highest number of false-positive  results (30). Notably, the urine tests did not appear to improve tumor  detection.</p>
<p>The researchers concluded that cystoscopy alone is the most  cost-effective method for monitoring for bladder cancer recurrence and  also results in the fewest false-positive tests.</p>
<p><strong>Reference:</strong></p>
<hr size="1" /><a href="#_ednref1">1</a> Karam JA, Shah, JB, Kader AK, et al. Prospective trial to identify  optimal bladder cancer surveillance protocol: Reducing costs while  maximizing sensitivity. Presented at the 2010 Genitourinary Cancers  Symposium in San Francisco. March 5-7, 2010. Abstract #275.﻿</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://indianacancer.com/cystoscopy-alone-is-the-most-cost-effective-way-to-monitor-for-recurrence-of-bladder-cancer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>PCA3 Test May Help Guide Prostate Biopsy Decisions</title>
		<link>http://indianacancer.com/pca3-test-may-help-guide-prostate-biopsy-decisions/</link>
		<comments>http://indianacancer.com/pca3-test-may-help-guide-prostate-biopsy-decisions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 17:57:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prostate Cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Screening/Prevention Prostate Cancer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://indianacancer.cancercenter.cc/pca3-test-may-help-guide-prostate-biopsy-decisions/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The PCA3 urine test may help guide decisions about the need for  repeat prostate biopsy in men with a negative initial biopsy but  elevated PSA. These results were presented at the 2010 ASCO  Genitourinary Cancer Symposium.
Since the late 1980s, the primary screening tool for early detection  of prostate  cancer has [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The PCA3 urine test may help guide decisions about the need for  repeat prostate biopsy in men with a negative initial biopsy but  elevated PSA. These results were presented at the 2010 ASCO  Genitourinary Cancer Symposium.</p>
<p>Since the late 1980s, the primary screening tool for early detection  of prostate  cancer has been the prostate specific antigen (PSA) test. While  this test is widely used, it remains controversial, due to both false  positive and false negative test results. Produced by cells in the  prostate, PSA levels in the blood tend to be elevated in men who have  prostate cancer. However, not all men with prostate cancer have elevated  PSA, and not all men with elevated PSA have prostate cancer. PSA levels  can also become elevated as a result of noncancerous conditions of the  prostate.</p>
<p>Men who have elevated levels of PSA are often referred for a prostate  biopsy in order to determine whether prostate cancer is present. Men  who have a negative first biopsy, however, are often likely to remain  uncertain about their risk of prostate cancer. This is because a biopsy  only samples small areas of the prostate, and it’s not uncommon for a  repeat biopsy to detect cancer that was missed by the first biopsy.</p>
<p>PCA3 is a test that could potentially help guide decisions about the  need for repeat prostate biopsy in men suspected of having prostate  cancer. PCA3 (prostate cancer gene 3) is overexpressed in men with  prostate cancer but not in men with noncancerous prostate problems. The  PCA3 test measures PCA3 expression in a sample of urine.</p>
<p>In the study presented at the Genitourinary Cancers Symposium, the  PCA3 test was evaluated in 1,072 men who had PSA levels between 2.5 and  10 ng/mL and a negative initial biopsy. Repeat biopsies were performed  after the second and fourth year of the study.</p>
<ul>
<li>A      higher PCA3 result indicated a greater likelihood of finding  prostate      cancer on a repeat prostate biopsy. Prostate cancer was  diagnosed in only      6% of men with a low PCA3 score but in 57% of men  with a high PCA3 score.</li>
<li>PCA3      results were correlated with cancer aggressiveness: men  with high-grade      cancers tended to have higher PCA3 results than men  with low-grade cancer.</li>
<li>PCA3      results also provided information about the likelihood of a  future      positive biopsy: men who had high PCA3 but a negative  prostate biopsy at      the two-year mark were more than twice as likely  to have prostate cancer      detected at the four-year mark than men  with low PCA3.</li>
</ul>
<p>These results suggest that the PCA3 test provides useful information  about the need for repeat prostate biopsy in men with elevated PSA.</p>
<p><strong>Reference:</strong> Groskopf J, Aubin SM, Reid J et al.  Validation of the PCA3 molecular urine test for predicting repeat  prostate biopsy outcome in the placebo arm of the dutasteride REDUCE  trial. Presented at the ASCO 2010 Genitourinary Cancers Symposium. March  5-7, 2010. San Francisco, CA. Abstract 5.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://indianacancer.com/pca3-test-may-help-guide-prostate-biopsy-decisions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bisphosphonates May Reduce the Risk of Breast Cancer</title>
		<link>http://indianacancer.com/bisphosphonates-may-reduce-the-risk-of-breast-cancer/</link>
		<comments>http://indianacancer.com/bisphosphonates-may-reduce-the-risk-of-breast-cancer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 17:55:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Breast Cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Screening/Prevention Breast Cancer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://indianacancer.cancercenter.cc/bisphosphonates-may-reduce-the-risk-of-breast-cancer/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Use of bisphosphonates to treat osteoporosis may reduce the risk of  breast cancer. The results of this study were published in the British  Journal of Cancer.
Bisphosphonates are a class of drugs used to prevent and treat  osteoporosis and to reduce the risk of bone complications from bone  metastases or multiple myeloma. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Use of bisphosphonates to treat osteoporosis may reduce the risk of  breast cancer. The results of this study were published in the <em>British  Journal of Cancer</em>.</p>
<p>Bisphosphonates are a class of drugs used to prevent and treat  osteoporosis and to reduce the risk of bone complications from bone  metastases or multiple myeloma. Studies have suggested that in addition  to their effects on bone, bisphosphonates may also have certain  anticancer effects.</p>
<p>To assess whether bisphosphonates used for osteoporosis influence the  risk of breast  cancer, researchers conducted a study among 2,936 women with breast  cancer and 2,975 women without breast cancer. All women were under the  age of 70 years.</p>
<p>Bisphosphonates that may be used to treat osteoporosis include Fosamax® (alendronate),  Actonel® (risedronate), Boniva® (ibandronate), and Reclast® (zoledronic  acid).</p>
<ul>
<li>Compared      with women who had never used bisphosphonates, women  who currently used bisphosphonates      were 33% less likely to develop  breast cancer.</li>
<li>Longer      duration of bisphosphonate use was associated with a  greater reduction in      risk of breast cancer.</li>
<li>The      reduction in risk of breast cancer among bisphosphonate  users appeared to      be limited to women who were not obese.</li>
</ul>
<p>The researchers concluded that bisphosphonates may be linked with a  potentially important reduction in breast cancer risk.</p>
<p>Like most drugs, bisphosphonates carry a risk of side effects. Women  who are considering bisphosphonate use to manage osteoporosis are  advised to talk with their doctor about the risks and benefits.</p>
<p><strong>Reference:</strong> Newcomb PA, Trentham-Dietz A, Hamptom JM.  Bisphosphonates for osteoporosis treatment are associated with reduced  breast cancer risk. <em>British Journal of Cancer</em>.  2010;102:799-802.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://indianacancer.com/bisphosphonates-may-reduce-the-risk-of-breast-cancer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cabazitaxel Shows Promise in Advanced Prostate Cancer</title>
		<link>http://indianacancer.com/cabazitaxel-shows-promise-in-advanced-prostate-cancer/</link>
		<comments>http://indianacancer.com/cabazitaxel-shows-promise-in-advanced-prostate-cancer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 14:38:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prostate Cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Refactory/Recurrent Prostate Cancer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://indianacancer.cancercenter.cc/cabazitaxel-shows-promise-in-advanced-prostate-cancer/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Among men with metastatic, hormone refractory prostate cancer that  has progressed after Taxotere® (docetaxel)-based chemotherapy, the  investigational chemotherapy drug cabazitaxel may improve survival. The  results of this Phase III clinical trial will be presented at the ASCO  2010 Genitourinary Cancers Symposium.
Prostate  cancer is a hormonally sensitive disease that can be [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Among men with metastatic, hormone refractory prostate cancer that  has progressed after Taxotere® (docetaxel)-based chemotherapy, the  investigational chemotherapy drug cabazitaxel may improve survival. The  results of this Phase III clinical trial will be presented at the ASCO  2010 Genitourinary Cancers Symposium.</p>
<p>Prostate  cancer is a hormonally sensitive disease that can be controlled for  long periods with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) or castration.  When prostate cancer stops responding to this treatment is it referred  to as hormone  refractory prostate cancer. Because hormone refractory prostate  cancer can be difficult to treat, new agents and treatment approaches  continue to be evaluated.</p>
<p>Cabazitaxel is an investigational chemotherapy drug. To evaluate  cabazitaxel in the treatment of metastatic, hormone refractory prostate  cancer, researchers conducted a Phase III clinical trial (the TROPIC  study) among 755 men in 26 countries. All of the study participants had  experienced cancer progression in spite of Taxotere-based chemotherapy.</p>
<p>Study participants were assigned to receive treatment with either  cabazitaxal plus prednisone or mitoxantrone plus prednisone.</p>
<ul>
<li>Median survival was 15.1 months among men treated with cabazitaxel  compared with 12.7 months among men treated with mitoxantrone.</li>
<li>Men treated with cabazitaxel also fared better in terms of  progression-free survival and tumor response rates.</li>
<li>Men treated with cabazitaxel were more likely than men treated with  mitoxantrone to develop febrile neutropenia (low white blood cell count  accompanied by fever).</li>
</ul>
<p>In a prepared statement, the lead investigator on the study noted:  “There are no effective treatments available to help men with metastatic  castration-resistant prostate cancer whose disease continues to grow  despite standard chemotherapy, and this large study shows an unequivocal  survival benefit for patients who received cabazitaxel.”</p>
<p>Cabazitaxel has not yet been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug  Administration (FDA). The results of this study will form the basis for a  submission for FDA review.</p>
<p><strong>Reference:</strong> Sartor AO, Oudard S, Ozguroglu M et al.  Cabazitaxel or mitoxantrone with prednisone in patients with metastatic  castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) previously treated with  docetaxel: final results of a multinational phase III trial (TROPIC).  Presented at the ASCO 2010 Genitourinary Cancers Symposium. March 5-7,  2010. San Francisco, CA. Abstract 9.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://indianacancer.com/cabazitaxel-shows-promise-in-advanced-prostate-cancer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Benefit of Velcade on Myeloma Survival Added to Prescribing Information</title>
		<link>http://indianacancer.com/benefit-of-velcade-on-myeloma-survival-added-to-prescribing-information/</link>
		<comments>http://indianacancer.com/benefit-of-velcade-on-myeloma-survival-added-to-prescribing-information/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 14:35:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Multiple Myeloma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stage I/Smoldering Myeloma Multiple Myeloma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stages II-III Multiple Myeloma]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://indianacancer.cancercenter.cc/benefit-of-velcade-on-myeloma-survival-added-to-prescribing-information/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved expanded  prescribing information for Velcade® (bortezomib). Velcade’s label now  includes results from the VISTA study, which show that Velcade improves  long-term overall survival among patients with previously untreated  multiple myeloma.
Multiple  myeloma is a cancer of plasma cells. Plasma cells are a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved expanded  prescribing information for Velcade® (bortezomib). Velcade’s label now  includes results from the VISTA study, which show that Velcade improves  long-term overall survival among patients with previously untreated  multiple myeloma.</p>
<p>Multiple  myeloma is a cancer of plasma cells. Plasma cells are a special  type of white blood cell that are part of the body’s immune system.  Plasma cells normally live in the bone marrow and make proteins, called  antibodies, which circulate in the blood and help fight certain types of  infections. Plasma cells also play a role in the maintenance of bone by  secretion of a hormone called osteoclast activating factor, which  causes the breakdown of bone. Patients with multiple myeloma have  increased numbers of abnormal plasma cells that may produce increased  quantities of dysfunctional antibodies detectable in the blood and/or  urine. These abnormal antibodies are referred to as paraproteins or  monoclonal proteins in the blood (M proteins) or urine (Bence Jones  protein).</p>
<p>Velcade is the first in a new class of anticancer agents known as proteasome  inhibitors. It’s been shown to provide benefits in the treatment of  multiple myeloma and mantle cell lymphoma.</p>
<p>The VISTA study is an international Phase III clinical trial. The  study enrolled 682 newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients who were  ineligible for stem cell transplantation. Patients were assigned to  receive treatment with melphalan and prednisone (MP) alone or in  combination with Velcade. Patients have now been followed for a median  of 36.7 months.</p>
<p>Compared with patients treated with MP alone, patients treated with  MP plus Velcade had a 35% reduction in risk of death. The addition of  Velcade to MP also delayed cancer progression and improved treatment  response rate.</p>
<p>The sustained overall survival benefit provided by Velcade has now  been added to the Velcade label. Information has also been added to the  label about dosing recommendations for patients with liver impairment.</p>
<p><strong>Reference:</strong> Millennium: The Takeda Oncology Company.  FDA Approves Addition of Sustained Overall Survival Benefit to Label for  Velcade® (Bortezomib) for Injection for Patients with Previously  Untreated Multiple Myeloma. Accessed March 4, 2010.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://indianacancer.com/benefit-of-velcade-on-myeloma-survival-added-to-prescribing-information/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cervical Vaccine Provides Little Benefit for Older Women</title>
		<link>http://indianacancer.com/cervical-vaccine-provides-little-benefit-for-older-women/</link>
		<comments>http://indianacancer.com/cervical-vaccine-provides-little-benefit-for-older-women/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 13:59:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cervical Cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Screening/Prevention Cervical Cancer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://indianacancer.cancercenter.cc/cervical-vaccine-provides-little-benefit-for-older-women/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Women over the age of 40 are not likely to benefit from a vaccine  designed to prevent human papillomavirus (HPV), according to the results  of a study published in the Journal of the National Cancer  Institute.1 HPV has been shown to cause cervical cancer.
Human papillomaviruses consist of more than 100 different viruses. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Women over the age of 40 are not likely to benefit from a vaccine  designed to prevent human papillomavirus (HPV), according to the results  of a study published in the <em>Journal of the National Cancer  Institute</em>.<a href="#_edn1">1</a> HPV has been shown to cause cervical cancer.</p>
<p>Human papillomaviruses consist of more than 100 different viruses.  Some types of HPV cause warts on the hands or feet; others cause genital  warts; and some have been linked with cancer, most notably cervical  cancer. The types of HPV most commonly linked with cervical cancer  are HPV16 and HPV18, but several other high-risk types contribute to  cancer as well.</p>
<p>The types of HPV that cause cervical cancer or genital warts are  transmitted sexually. HPV infection is extremely common and generally  occurs soon after an individual becomes sexually active. Although most  infections resolve on their own, some persist and can lead to  precancerous or cancerous changes to the cervix, vulva, vagina, penis,  and anus. HPV infection has also been linked to certain cancers of the  head and neck.</p>
<p>Recognition of the link between HPV and cervical cancer led to the  development of vaccines designed to prevent infection with certain  high-risk types of HPV.</p>
<p>Currently, there are two vaccines approved for the prevention of HPV  16 and 18: Gardasil®  and Cervarix®.  Gardasil also protects against HPV 6 and 11, which are associated with  most types of genital warts. The vaccines are recommended for girls as  young as age 9 and up to age 26. Little data exists, however, to  determine whether older women will benefit from the vaccines.</p>
<p>A study of more than 9,000 Costa Rican women ages 19 to 97 evaluated  the patterns of HPV infection as women age. The researchers found that  the rate of newly detected infections declined with age—from 35% in  women ages 18-25 to 13.5% in women over the age of 42. In both younger  and older women, new infections typically cleared up without treatment  within two years. They found that new infections typically did not  progress to worse disease in older women.</p>
<p>Based on their findings, the researchers concluded that HPV  vaccination was not likely to be beneficial for older women. The  vaccinations are used to prevent new infections, and older women are not  getting many new infections.</p>
<p><strong>Reference:</strong></p>
<hr size="1" /><a href="#_ednref1">1</a> Rodriguez AC, Schiffman M, Herrero R, et al. Longitudinal study of  human papillomavirus persistence and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia  grade 2/3: Critical role of duration of infection. <em>Journal of the  National Cancer Institute</em>. 2010; 102: 1-10.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://indianacancer.com/cervical-vaccine-provides-little-benefit-for-older-women/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cryoablation Effective for Renal Cancer</title>
		<link>http://indianacancer.com/cryoablation-effective-for-renal-cancer/</link>
		<comments>http://indianacancer.com/cryoablation-effective-for-renal-cancer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 13:57:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General Renal Cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Renal Cancer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://indianacancer.cancercenter.cc/cryoablation-effective-for-renal-cancer/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Stereotactic percutaneous cryoablation and laparoscopic renal  cryoablation are effective treatments for selected patients with kidney  cancer, according to the results of two studies published in the Journal  of Urology.1,2
The kidneys are each filled with tiny tubules that clean and filter  the blood; this process removes waste and makes urine. Renal  [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stereotactic percutaneous cryoablation and laparoscopic renal  cryoablation are effective treatments for selected patients with kidney  cancer, according to the results of two studies published in the <em>Journal  of Urology</em>.<a href="#_edn1">1</a><a href="#_edn2">,2</a></p>
<p>The kidneys are each filled with tiny tubules that clean and filter  the blood; this process removes waste and makes urine. Renal  cell cancer (RCC) is a malignancy involving these tubules of the  kidney. Surgery is the mainstay of treatment for kidney cancer, as the  cancer is typically resistant to radiation and chemotherapy.  Historically, surgical treatment of RCC consisted of a radical  nephrectomy, which involves removal of the entire kidney, local lymph  nodes, and any cancer in the area surrounding the kidney. The trend in  the surgical management of RCC, however, is to perform less aggressive  surgery when possible.</p>
<p>Cryoablation is a minimally invasive technique that uses extremely  cold temperatures to “freeze” small cancers. In patients with cancer  that is less than or equal to 5.0 cm in diameter, cryoablation appears  to be a promising approach for removing the cancer. Two recent studies  evaluated two different methods of cryoablation.</p>
<p>Researchers from the Cleveland Clinic evaluated CT-Nav®, a  stereotactic surgical navigation system that delivers cryoablation and  radiation to a tumor via a cryoprobe. This reduces the radiation  exposure compared with conventional radiation treatment. This was a  prospective pilot study designed to evaluate the feasibility, safety,  and accuracy of the system. The system was used to cryoablate 13 tumors  in 10 patients. The mean tumor size was 2.2 cm; mean operation time was  155 minutes; and mean length of hospital stay was 9.5 hours. There were  no complications. The researchers concluded that this method offers  potential for patients with kidney cancer.</p>
<p>Researchers from the University of Southern California evaluated  laparoscopic renal cryoablation in 80 patients with renal tumors; the  mean tumor size was 2.3 cm. All patients were treated by a single  surgeon and then followed for a minimum of five years. At five years  overall survival was 84%, and progression-free survival was 81%. At ten  years overall survival was 51%, and progression-free survival was 78%.  The researchers concluded that this as an effective treatment for select  patients.</p>
<p>The results of these two studies indicate that cryoablation may start  to play a larger role in the surgical treatment of kidney cancer.</p>
<p><strong>References: </strong></p>
<hr size="1" /><a href="#_ednref1">1</a> Haber GP, Crouzet S, Remer EM, et al. Stereotactic percutaneous  cryoablation for renal tumors: Initial clinical experience. <em>Journal  of Urology</em>. 2010; 183: 884-888.</p>
<p><a href="#_ednref2">2</a> Aron M, KAmoi K, Remer E, et al. Laparoscopic renal cryoablation:  8-year, single-surgeon outcomes. <em>Journal of Urology</em>. 2010; 183:  889-895.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://indianacancer.com/cryoablation-effective-for-renal-cancer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Laparoscopic Surgery and Open Surgery Produce Similar Complication Rates in Prostate Cancer</title>
		<link>http://indianacancer.com/laparoscopic-surgery-and-open-surgery-produce-similar-complication-rates-in-prostate-cancer/</link>
		<comments>http://indianacancer.com/laparoscopic-surgery-and-open-surgery-produce-similar-complication-rates-in-prostate-cancer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 17:39:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Early Stage I-II (A-B) Prostate Cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prostate Cancer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://indianacancer.cancercenter.cc/laparoscopic-surgery-and-open-surgery-produce-similar-complication-rates-in-prostate-cancer/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Laparoscopic prostatectomy and open radical prostatectomy produce  similar outcomes and carry similar rates of postoperative complications,  according to the results of a study published in an early online  version of the Journal of Urology.1
Radical prostatectomy refers to the surgical removal of the entire  prostate and some surrounding tissue. Prostatectomy may be [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Laparoscopic prostatectomy and open radical prostatectomy produce  similar outcomes and carry similar rates of postoperative complications,  according to the results of a study published in an early online  version of the <em>Journal of Urology</em>.<a href="#_edn1">1</a></p>
<p>Radical prostatectomy refers to the surgical removal of the entire  prostate and some surrounding tissue. Prostatectomy may be performed  using traditional open surgery, in which the surgeon makes a single,  long incision; or through a laparoscopic  procedure (sometimes called minimally invasive surgery), in which  several small incisions are made. During laparoscopy, the surgeon  inserts a small video camera through one of the incisions in order to  see inside the abdomen. In a variant of laparoscopic surgery known as  robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery, the surgeon sits at a console  near the operating table and performs the surgery by controlling robotic  arms that hold the surgical instruments.</p>
<p>Laparoscopic surgery has been perceived as a less invasive procedure  that may preserve erectile function; however, there has been little  research and no data to substantiate this claim.</p>
<p>A population-based study included 5,923 men aged 66 or older with  localized prostate  cancer. All of the men underwent radical prostatectomy between 2003  and 2005; 18% of these procedures were performed laparoscopically.  After adjusting for patient and tumor characteristics, the researchers  found that there were no differences in the rate of complications  between the two surgeries nor were there differences in postoperative  treatment with radiation or hormone therapy.</p>
<p>The laparoscopic procedure was associated with a 35% shorter hospital  stay and a 26% lower rate of bladder neck and urethral obstruction.  Patients who underwent surgery from surgeons who performed a higher  volume of laparoscopic procedures tended to have shorter hospital stays  and reduced chance of genitourinary and bowel complications.</p>
<p>The researchers concluded that laparoscopic and open prostatectomy  produce similar results and similar rates of complications. Therefore,  men considering prostatectomy must weigh the risks and benefits of each  procedure to make an informed, personal decision.</p>
<p><strong>Reference:</strong></p>
<hr size="1" /><a href="#_ednref1">1</a> Lowrance WT, Elkin EB, Jacks LM, et al. Comparative effectiveness of  prostate cancer surgical treatments: A population based analysis of  postoperative outcomes. <em>Journal of Urology</em> [early online  publication]. February 25, 2010.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://indianacancer.com/laparoscopic-surgery-and-open-surgery-produce-similar-complication-rates-in-prostate-cancer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
